<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank of America&#8217;s SiteKey System is Useless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tech-talkers.com/index.php/2007/07/bank-of-americas-sitekey-system-is-useless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tech-talkers.com/index.php/2007/07/bank-of-americas-sitekey-system-is-useless/</link>
	<description>Let's Talk Tech...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:12:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dispensa</title>
		<link>http://www.tech-talkers.com/index.php/2007/07/bank-of-americas-sitekey-system-is-useless/comment-page-1/#comment-2485</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dispensa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tech-talkers.com/?p=142#comment-2485</guid>
		<description>It is truly amazing to me that SiteKey can say with a straight face that a browser cookie counts as a second authentication factor. It&#039;s nothing more than a convenience feature that prevents you from having to answer your four security questions on every login.

McAfee has a phishing &quot;aptitude test&quot; that&#039;s floating around the Internet right now, where users are asked to pick the genuine site from a pair, one of which is an actual phishing site. The truly scary thing is that I only really had grammar bugs to go on for many of the sites. If the phishers ever learn English, we&#039;re in trouble.

Of course, for non-native speakers of English, the problem is already here, unless they&#039;re amazingly good non-native speakers.

Related: my company just released a new two-factor authentication system using automated phone calls: http://phonefactor.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is truly amazing to me that SiteKey can say with a straight face that a browser cookie counts as a second authentication factor. It&#8217;s nothing more than a convenience feature that prevents you from having to answer your four security questions on every login.</p>
<p>McAfee has a phishing &#8220;aptitude test&#8221; that&#8217;s floating around the Internet right now, where users are asked to pick the genuine site from a pair, one of which is an actual phishing site. The truly scary thing is that I only really had grammar bugs to go on for many of the sites. If the phishers ever learn English, we&#8217;re in trouble.</p>
<p>Of course, for non-native speakers of English, the problem is already here, unless they&#8217;re amazingly good non-native speakers.</p>
<p>Related: my company just released a new two-factor authentication system using automated phone calls: <a href="http://phonefactor.net." rel="nofollow">http://phonefactor.net.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
